Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
ASAIO J ; 68(6): 779-784, 2022 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1702923

ABSTRACT

Initial reports described a hypercoagulable state and an increased risk of thrombosis in patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Infected patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), leading to coagulopathies and further increasing the risk for bleeding and thrombosis. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study to compare the incidence of major bleeding and thrombosis in COVID-19 versus influenza-positive patients requiring ECMO. There was no difference in the incidence of major bleeding (67.7% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.287) or major thrombosis (9.7% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.356) between COVID-19 and influenza patients, respectively. COVID-19 patients experienced significantly fewer major bleeding events per ECMO days compared with influenza (0.1 [interquartile range 0-0.2] vs. 0.2 [interquartile range 0.1-0.5], p = 0.026). Influenza patients may be at higher risk for developing coagulopathies that contribute to bleeding. Larger evaluations are needed to confirm these results and further assess bleeding and thrombosis risk in these populations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Influenza, Human , Thrombosis , COVID-19/complications , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Influenza, Human/complications , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Thrombosis/epidemiology , Thrombosis/etiology
2.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 78(8): 736-742, 2021 03 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1081092

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Obtaining an accurate medication history from patients on hospital admission is a priority in pharmacy practice. Timely and accurate histories are imperative as they may help determine the etiology of illness and prevent medication errors. We conducted a quality improvement project to assess the accuracy of alternate-source medication histories obtained for critically ill patients who were delirious or mechanically ventilated at the time of intensive care unit admission. METHODS: Included patients were 18 years of age or older, admitted to the medical intensive care unit from August 2017 through January 2018, and had a medication history obtained from a family member or outpatient pharmacy due to active delirium or mechanical ventilation. Patients were directly interviewed after resolution of delirium or extubation. Discrepancies between the initial and follow-up histories were documented and categorized using the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) Index for Categorizing Medication Errors. RESULTS: Forty patients were included. One hundred four discrepancies were documented, with a median of 2 discrepancies per patient. The most common types of discrepancies were addition (51.9%), followed by omission (24.0%). NCC MERP index category A (51%) was the most common error classification identified. CONCLUSION: Discrepancies between initial and follow-up medication histories occurred at a frequent rate in delirious or mechanically ventilated patients; however, these discrepancies tended to be of low risk severity.


Subject(s)
Medication Reconciliation , Respiration, Artificial , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Patient Admission
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL